The Wisconsin Program: What really happens

Ofira Ben-Shalom from Amutat Alon, who is our partner at the Lev Hadera center, accompanied this week two participants in the Wisconsin program to the appeal committee. Ofira is not an attorney, therefore she can not speak to the members of the committee, but she can talk to the participant.

Here is Ofira’s testimony on what happened at the appeal committees:

This Tuesday I was present at the appeal of two participants. The committees were horrible. I left with a heavy feeling and with several questions about the committees’ functioning. The first case was an appeal over the cancellation of one-month pension. During the meeting the Agens representatives played a recording of the participant as backing for their version.

This was the first time I have heard such a recording of a discussion between a participant and his program counselor. It makes awful injustice to the participants. Their anger is taken out of context, and when only a part of the tape is played his saying that he will not go back there does sound as a threat, but we do not know what he was told a second before. The second case was even worse. The pension was canceled for two months under the claim that the participant misbehaved and lacks motivation. The committee urged Agens to find a solution. They came up with a creative one – the participant has to prove her motivation by going herself to 6 manpower companies and trying to find a job. She has to bring confirmations she is registered as a job seeker at these companies and also go to all interviews she is sent by Agens. If she will find a job she will have a salary, and if she makes all the efforts, her pension will be returned. Literally re-socialization.

I received only shouts from the committee members. In the first case, as I managed to calm down the participant, they allowed me to ask two questions. In the second case I had my mouth shut. And when the participant tried to say loudly what I recommended her to ask, they answered her promptly that it’s irrelevant.

It’s not such a big issue to go to a manpower company and register as a job seeker (and I accompanied the participant to two of them, and there really is no work). But the question is what does the government pay Agens for? Not for doing the job seeking process for the participants?

That’s it, only to show who we work with. When I left the committee with the participants, the Agens employment coordinator passed by and said towards us ‘This will teach you how to behave at an interview’. I have no words”.

To sum things up, these things represent most of the feelings people who work and volunteer in helping participants in the Wisconsin Program. Regretfully not all participants are represented by an attorney, and when a lawyer is involved, usually the participant wins the case or a more convenient compromise is achieved.

More than that, instead of helping a participant to learn how to find work, or as the law puts it “to remove the obstacles that stand before her in finding a job”, she was sent to seek jobs by herself, with no assistance. Ofira’s question is most appropriate – why does the government pay millions of shekels to Agens, if they send her to find work by herself?

The creative decision of the appeal committee was to send the participant to 6 manpower offices, to show her commitment to finding a job.

The participant came back to me with new information: It is not enough to go to manpower offices, register and interview once for a job and wait for a second interview. “Agens” say that it’s up to them to decide when they will erase her “refusal” and it will be only after she starts working in a place they will provide or she will find a job. Opposing the appeal committee’s decision, the participant is completely depended on the good will of the company.

The participant was sent to an elderly citizens’ home in Ramat Gan, but was not accepted due to medical problems. Her candidancy was also rejected in another an elderly citizens’ home and an additional “refusal” was written down in her file. The woman will not receive her allowance now for three months although the appeal committee wondered bout Agens attitude toward the participant after a whole year of co-operation.

Recent Articles by Rabbi Idit Lev

Rabbis for Human Rights recommends that you read these articles in Economic Justice

Leave a Reply



You can use these XHTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>