Qorah: Clarity in arguments in defense of Human Rights

This week’s portion describes the rebellion or rebellions in the desert against Moses. We are taught in Pirke Avot that the conflict initiated by Korakh and his followers is an example of an argument that is not for the “Sake of Heaven.” The debates between Hillel and Shamai are given as an example of an argument that is For the Sake of Heaven. Sometimes the dissenting views that we raise are discounted by those who disagree as arguments “Not for the Sake of Heaven.” In other cases, weighty disagreements are played down by saying that there is a legitimate difference of opinion, and that there is no moral superiority of one side over the other. Without a doubt, the complex reality we live in creates situations in which it only a fool or a fanatic can be so sure that they are right that they delegitimize the view of the other. Nevertheless, if we truly believe that the human being is created in the Image of God, the diminishment of God’s Image via the violation of the human rights of a fellow human being cannot be put off as “elu v’elu dvarim Elohim Khayim.” The Midrash says that Korakh was very clever in making his arguments so clever that Moses had difficulty in answering. Even as we maintain our pluralism, we must be very clear that arguments in defense of human rights violations cannot be an argument for the Sake of Heaven. May it be Your Will that we always defend Your Name and always do so in ways that are clear in the Name of Heaven.

Recent Articles by Rabbi Arik W. Ascherman

Leave a Reply



You can use these XHTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>